Taking a Stand
April 13
Lesson 7
Devotional Reading:
Psalm 121.
Background Scripture:
Daniel 3.
Printed Text:
Daniel 3:10–13, 16–18, 21, 24–26.
Daniel 3:10–13, 16–18, 21, 24–26
10 Thou, O king, hast made a decree, that every man that
shall hear the sound of the cornet, flute, harp, sackbut, psaltery, and
dulcimer, and all kinds of music, shall fall down and worship the golden
image:
11 And whoso falleth not down and worshippeth, that he
should be cast into the midst of a burning fiery furnace.
12 There are certain Jews whom thou hast set over the
affairs of the province of Babylon, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego; these
men, O king, have not regarded thee: they serve not thy gods, nor worship the
golden image which thou hast set up.
13 Then Nebuchadnezzar in his rage and fury commanded to
bring Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego. Then they brought these men before the
king.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
16 Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, answered and said to
the king, O Nebuchadnezzar, we are not careful to answer thee in this matter.
17 If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver
us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of thine hand, O
king.
18 But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we
will not serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
21 Then these men were bound in their coats, their hose,
and their hats, and their other garments, and were cast into the midst of the
burning fiery furnace.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
24 Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astonished, and rose
up in haste, and spake, and said unto his counselors, Did not we cast three
men bound into the midst of the fire? They answered and said unto the king,
True, O king.
25 He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose,
walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the
fourth is like the Son of God.
26 Then Nebuchadnezzar came near to the mouth of the
burning fiery furnace, and spake, and said, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego,
ye servants of the most high God, come forth, and come hither. Then Shadrach,
Meshach, and Abednego, came forth of the midst of the fire.
Golden Text:
If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning
fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of thine hand, O king. But if not,
be it known unto thee, O king, that we will not serve thy gods, nor worship
the golden image which thou hast set up.—Daniel 3:17, 18.
Lesson Aims
After participating in this lesson, each student will be able to:
1. Retell the story of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego and
the fiery furnace.
2. List some challenges that believers face in which they
are threatened with harm if they do not go along with popular thinking or
behavior.
3. Take a stand against one ungodly law or cultural
practice.
How to Say It
Abednego.
Uh-bed-nee-go.
Azariah.
Az-uh-rye-uh.
Babylon.
Bab-uh-lun.
Babylonia.
Bab-ih-low-nee-uh.
Chaldeans.
Kal-dee-unz.
Hananiah.
Han-uh-nye-uh.
Meshach.
Me-shack.
Mishael.
Mish-a-el.
Nebuchadnezzar.
Neb-yuh-kud-nez-er
(strong accent on nez).
Shadrach.
Shay-drack
or Shad-rack.
Urijah.
Yu-rye-juh.
Home Daily Bible Readings
Monday, Apr. 7—God’s Protection Forevermore
(Psalm 121:1–4)
Tuesday, Apr. 8—King
Nebuchadnezzar’s Golden Statue (Daniel 3:1–7)
Wednesday, Apr. 9—The
Refusal to Worship the Statue (Daniel 3:8–15)
Thursday, Apr. 10—Brought
Before the King (Daniel 3:16–23)
Friday, Apr. 11—Not a Hint
of Fire (Daniel 3:24–27)
Saturday, Apr. 12—A New
Decree (Daniel 3:28–30)
Sunday, Apr. 13—God Will
Keep You (Psalm 121:5–8)
Lesson Outline
Introduction
A. Learning to Say
No, Part 1
B. Lesson Background
I. Resistance
(Daniel 3:10–13)
A. King’s Decree (vv. 10, 11)
B. Jews’ Refusal (v. 12)
Scapegoats
C. King’s Rage (v. 13)
II. Faithfulness
(Daniel 3:16–18)
A. Jews’ Persistence (v. 16)
B. Jews’ Resoluteness (vv.
17, 18)
The Pressure of a Profane Culture
III. Deliverance
(Daniel 3:21, 24–26)
A. Jews’ Punishment (v. 21)
B. King’s Astonishment (vv.
24, 25)
C. God’s Praise (v. 26)
Conclusion
A. Learning to Say
No, Part 2
B. Prayer
C. Thought to Remember
Introduction
A.
Learning to Say No,
Part 1
Not long ago, a television cartoon mocked the popular
Christian animation series Veggie Tales.
A friend alerted me to this spoof because of its sick portrayal of the
Christian faith. I will not go into all the details, but imagine the cast of
Veggie Tales—now
called the Religetables—looking
at pornographic material, killing infidels during the crusades, hanging
innocent “witches” in Salem, molesting children, etc., while singing pious
songs with their cute veggie voices.
Sadly, this warped depiction of Christianity (or at least
parts of it) is the image many nonbelievers have of Christian faith. Yet it
should not surprise us that unbelievers would portray Christianity in this
light. The name of Christ has been slandered from the beginning. What is
surprising, however, is how common it is for Christians to enjoy watching
programs that routinely belittle Christ and His church.
This incongruity reveals the inability of many Christians
to say no to
various activities. We may feel justified in participating in it as long as we
do not let its bad parts affect us. We fear that saying
no to such activities will
make us appear to be puritanical legalists.
This line of reasoning may sound valid, but is it? In
Daniel 3, three young Jews faced a similar question. Their answer is
instructive.
B. Lesson Background
Last week we learned that Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah
were among the young Jewish nobles who were taken into exile during the early
days of Babylonian domination of
Judah. Daniel 1:7 notes the change of their names to Shadrach, Meshach, and
Abednego. Following Daniel’s lead, they boldly stood out by choosing their own
diet over the king’s rations. God honored their stance by exalting them in the
king’s court and kingdom.
The situation changes in Daniel 3. Independent of Daniel’s
leadership, these young men face a new challenge. King Nebuchadnezzar erected
a giant statue approximately 90’ high and 9’ wide. Bizarre dimensions
notwithstanding, this monument to human greatness, like the tower of Babel in
Genesis 11, was a farce in God’s eyes.
In Nebuchadnezzar’s eyes, however, this statue played a
critical role in the stability of his empire. He had relocated droves of
foreigners to his capital city, and it was necessary to keep everyone on the
same page. Nebuchadnezzar needed to make it clear that there was only one law,
one king, and one empire—and that it all revolved around him. This is why he
sent a decree to “people, nations, and languages” that when the king
authorized the imperial music to play, they all had to worship the statue
(Daniel 3:4, 5).
Failure to comply meant fiery execution. The statue was a
symbolic reminder that the Babylonian kingdom was undivided despite its
diversity. From an earthly, imperial perspective, it all made perfect sense.
But from a godly perspective, it was riddled with problems. In today’s text we
see how three faithful Jews handled this situation.
I. Resistance
(Daniel
3:10–13)
In
verses 8, 9, certain Babylonians (Chaldeans) approach Nebuchadnezzar to remind
him of a decree he has established. Yet their agenda is not merely
informative. They intend to accuse God’s people of violating this decree.
A. King’s Decree (vv. 10, 11)
10. Thou, O king, hast made a decree, that every man
that shall hear the sound of the cornet, flute, harp, sackbut, psaltery, and
dulcimer, and all kinds of music, shall fall down and worship the golden
image.
What a diversity of musical instruments! Stylistically, it
is worth noting that much of Daniel 3 consists of lists of related but
distinct items and people, many repeated several times (Daniel 3:3–5, 7, 10,
12–16, 19–23, 26–30). Repetition is a trademark of Hebrew storytelling. The
repetition produces a poetic feel with a certain cadence.
We may be curious about the exact form the
golden image takes. Is it an
image of the king himself? a Babylonian god? some other national or religious
symbol? In chapter two, Daniel tells Nebuchadnezzar that he, the king, is the
golden head of a statue that he has dreamed about. So perhaps his inflated ego
has prompted him to build a golden statue of himself.
On the other hand, the accusations against the Jews in this
chapter are that they will not heed the king, serve his gods, or worship the
statue (vv. 12, 14, 18). Is this list intended to indicate different, distinct
offenses, or does the list merely indicate different aspects of the one
offense of not bowing to the statue? Again, the text is silent.
Not identifying the precise nature of the statue may be the
author’s way of saying that what matters most is that the king’s decree is
violated. What is at stake is the king’s authority to dictate what his
citizens must do, even if it violates their faith convictions. [See
question #1, page 288.]
11. And whoso falleth not down and worshippeth, that he
should be cast into the midst of a burning fiery furnace.
The penalty for disobedience is severe indeed! But what is
the nature of this furnace?
We do not know for sure, but it may be made of metal and shaped like a beehive
with an open top out of which smoke can escape. Additionally, it probably has
some kind of side door for removing ashes and monitoring the burning process.
Another theory is that it is made of brick and shaped like a tunnel with a
similar access door on the side.
B. Jews’ Refusal (v. 12)
12. There are certain Jews whom thou hast set over the
affairs of the province of Babylon, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego; these
men, O king, have not regarded thee: they serve not thy gods, nor worship the
golden image which thou hast set up.
The accusers finally get to the point. The very ones whom
Nebuchadnezzar has set over
his affairs refuse to serve
the king’s gods and
worship
the golden
image. This verse does not
help us discern if the image is associated with the gods, but it is abundantly
clear that failure to serve the gods and honor the image is interpreted as a
failure to regard the king. The charge is insubordination; the evidence behind
the charge involves both gods and the statue.
This passage bookends the denunciation that begins in
Daniel 3:8. Verse 8 specifies that the accusers are Chaldeans (natives of
Babylonia), and the accused are Jews.
(This point is obscured by the New International
Version, which identifies the accusers as
“astrologers”—a possible but less likely translation.) Then, in verse 12, the
accusers highlight the fact that the king has set Jews over the affairs of
Babylon. The repeated use of these terms suggests that “the locals” are
jealous. (We probably see jealousy also in Daniel 6:1–5.) After all, the
Babylonian natives have long served loyally, and now these immigrants have
been elevated to positions higher than theirs.
So now it is payback time. When the accusers inform the
king how these foreigners are ignoring his decree, he will surely punish them
and return the locals to their rightful positions of power and influence. [See
question #2, page 288.]
Visual for Lessons 6 & 7
Continue last week’s discussion:
“What kind of temptation gives you the most trouble?”
Scapegoats
Finding scapegoats to explain whatever is wrong has a long history. It started
in the Garden of Eden (see Genesis 3:12). Modern politicians are especially
adept at this. Is the economy in trouble? It’s because of the policies of the
other political party. Is there too much crime? It’s because the previous
administration did not crack down on “those people” who are different from
us—in skin color, religion, etc.
Name a trouble spot anywhere in the world, and someone can
name a scapegoat for why things are the way they are. For Hitler, it was the
Jews; for many Arab countries, it’s America; in the case of natural disasters
in the U.S., blame FEMA. The list goes on.
For Nebuchadnezzar’s advisers, the problem to be solved was
personal. They were loyal Chaldeans, but their king had placed capable Jews in
positions of authority. Those Jews had taken jobs that the Chaldeans probably
thought belonged to them. So “they played the race card,” and the king fell
for it. (We will see this same problem play out in next week’s lesson.) The
nature of their charge was almost beside the point—it was a convenient
launching point for an attempt at payback. It still happens. —C.
R. B.
C. King’s Rage (v. 13)
13. Then Nebuchadnezzar in his rage and fury commanded
to bring Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego. Then they brought these men before
the king.
The accusers’ plan succeeds, and
Nebuchadnezzar takes the
offense personally. He may have taken a lot of flak already for his decision
to exalt foreigners, and now it blows up in his face. Nebuchadnezzar has been
gracious in offering these foreigners education, food, and positions. They
have every reason to be grateful, but in Nebuchadnezzar’s mind they respond
with ingratitude.
II. Faithfulness
(Daniel
3:16–18)
Although Nebuchadnezzar is furious, he does not act rashly. He invites
Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego in and allows them to explain themselves. He
gives them a second chance (Daniel 3:14, 15, not in today’s text).
A. Jews’ Persistence (v. 16)
16. Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, answered and said
to the king, O Nebuchadnezzar, we are not careful to answer thee in this
matter.
The phrase we are not careful
to answer thee in this matter in the antique
English of the King James Version
may sound curious to modern ears. It means something like “there is no need
for us to offer a defense of our actions.” In short, the three Jews are
responding with a firm no
to the second chance they are being offered. The force of this
no needs to be felt by
Christians today.
We may note that the king’s request is not as drastic as it
could be since he is not asking these Jews to stop worshiping their own God
altogether. He is “merely” asking them to make a certain addition to their
worship practice. Is this not the least they can do to pay him respect?
Yet the modern habit of rationalizing questionable
practices is nowhere to be found in Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego. They know
that the God of Israel is not to be worshiped alongside other gods. God has no
equal, and He will not tolerate being treated as such (Deuteronomy 4:35, 39).
[See question #3, page 288.]
Any action that grants uncontestable allegiance to a
sovereign other than God is idolatry. That’s what bowing before the statue
would do. It is one thing to work for the king and show him the basic respect
that is due to those in authority. It is another thing entirely to acknowledge
someone or something as a rival to God.
Today, respect also is due to presidents, governors,
bosses, ministers, elders, and parents (Mark 7:10; 1 Timothy 5:17). But they
do not have blanket permission to lead in such a way that they eclipse God.
The prophet Jeremiah commanded the Jews to submit to the Babylonian Empire
(Jeremiah 27), and the apostles taught Christians to submit to the Roman
Empire (Romans 13:1; 1 Peter 2:13–17). But God’s people are never to interpret
such commands as unconditional support for any and all actions of earthly
rulers (example: Acts 4:18–20).
B. Jews’ Resoluteness (vv. 17, 18)
17, 18. If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to
deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of thine
hand, O king. But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we will not
serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up.
These three Jews express faith in
God in two ways. First, they
acknowledge that God is able to deliver
them from both the fiery furnace
and the king who
thinks he has absolute power. They do not worship a weak god or a distant god
who is unable to intervene in events on earth. They worship Israel’s God, who
has proven His ability and who desires to work for the good of those who love
Him (Deuteronomy 7:9; Romans 8:28). So too Christians today rightly pray for
God’s intervention. Those who seek to live on their own strength, to muscle
their own way out of the tough spots in life, and to avoid faith decisions
that require divine assistance have marginalized Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Second, these three Jews are firm in their worship of God
to the point that they refuse to bow, whether God chooses to intervene or not.
God’s nonintervention is a strong possibility. In His larger plan, God does
not always choose to intervene, as the deaths of Urijah (Jeremiah 26:20–23)
and James (Acts 12:1, 2) establish.
Yet true believers are those who faithfully serve God
regardless of the negative consequences they may suffer. Christians continue
to die for their faith in many parts of the world. Others have lost jobs,
housing, and other necessities. Unfortunately, there are also those who claim
to be Christians who show that they actually are idolaters because of the
compromises they make for the sake of pride, position, property, popularity,
or power.
The Pressure of a Profane
Culture
Ginny Foster spent $10,000 four years ago on T-shirts and bumper stickers that
expressed opposition to the deluge of dirty language that surrounds us. Talk
about trying to resist culture! Sadly, she gave up the project within two
years, saying she no longer had the fire within her to fight this battle.
After she appeared on a Showtime TV show, her Web site received hundreds of
e-mails full of abusive curses.
Americans do indeed live in a profane culture. An
Associated Press opinion poll found that 74 percent encounter profanity
frequently or occasionally, while 59 percent admit to cursing a few times a
month. Listen carefully and you may even hear profanity among Christians.
Certain profane words are so commonly used that those who
really want to curse may soon
have to come up with some new terms!
This is just one of many ways secular culture affects (and
infects) godly people. Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego set a good example by
being careful not to compromise with the pagan culture in which they lived. We
each may be tempted to sin in different ways, but watchfulness is a trait all
Christians should cultivate. —C. R. B.
III. Deliverance
(Daniel 3:21,
24–26)
Verses 19 and 20 (not in today’s text) tell us that Nebuchadnezzar will not
accept no for an
answer. So the three are to be executed in a furnace heated to seven times its
normal level. Some of the king’s strongest men are assigned the task of
binding Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego.
A. Jews’ Punishment (v. 21)
21. Then these men were bound in their coats, their
hose, and their hats, and their other garments, and were cast into the midst
of the burning fiery furnace.
The three Jews are threatening the unity of the king’s
empire. If Nebuchadnezzar allows them to walk free, he will appear to be weak
and indecisive. So the king has to honor his decree and toss them into the
fire. Not only that, but he decides to make an example of them by cranking the
fire up so high that the men who throw them in die for coming so close (v. 22,
not in today’s text).
It is interesting to note what kind of religion the Babylon
Empire is willing to tolerate. In Daniel 2:47, Nebuchadnezzar acknowledges
Israel’s God as the God of gods. Presumably this means that it is OK for Jews
to worship their God while others worship Babylonian gods. Nebuchadnezzar thus
appears to be a tolerant religious pluralist. His subjects can worship
whatever and whomever they wish as long as they remain devout citizens who do
what is asked of them. This includes “adjusting” one’s religious beliefs when
the king deems it necessary. Worship of any deity who authorizes worshipers to
deny the king’s policies is not acceptable. [See
question #4, page 288.]
B. King’s Astonishment (vv. 24, 25)
24, 25. Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astonished, and
rose up in haste, and spake, and said unto his counselors, Did not we cast
three men bound into the midst of the fire? They answered and said unto the
king, True, O king. He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in
the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is
like the Son of God.
As Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego believe, God is able to
spare them. Moreover, God actually does spare them from the flames. It is a
miracle that the men are walking around alive and well.
Our only clue as to how all this happens is the fourth
person, this Son of God,
who walks among the flames. We should not assume that this fourth person is an
Old Testament appearance of Jesus, although we cannot rule out this
possibility. The description Son of God
is given from the perspective of Nebuchadnezzar, not from one of the devout
Jews.
In Old Testament times, the phrase
son(s) of God sometimes refer
to people, but also can refer to an angel (examples: Genesis 6:2, 4; Job 1:6;
2:1; 38:7). This is the most probable reading of our verse. God may be sending
an angel to comfort these Jews or to provide a sign to the king and his
counselors. Either way, God gets the king’s attention!
C. God’s Praise (v. 26)
26. Then Nebuchadnezzar came near to the mouth of the
burning fiery furnace, and spake, and said, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego,
ye servants of the most high God, come forth, and come hither. Then Shadrach,
Meshach, and Abednego, came forth of the midst of the fire.
It is a mystery how the king can draw close enough to the
fire to speak over the roaring flames without being consumed like the men who
threw Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego in! His message nonetheless is
communicated, and the Jews walk out unharmed. Not a hair is singed, and their
garments bear no scent of smoke according to verse 27. When God delivers, He
does so in a convincing manner!
Nebuchadnezzar is certainly convinced. He refers to the
Jews as servants of the most high God.
This praise culminates in a royal decree that protects those who worship
Israel’s God (Daniel 3:29). The point is clear: God is indeed the most high
God, and His will always prevails in the end. Those who worship Him alone do
so with this ultimate end in sight, regardless of short-term suffering. [See
question #5, page 288.]
Conclusion
A.
Learning to Say No,
Part 2
Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego teach us that it sometimes
is necessary to say no
even when an activity can be rationalized. They could have bowed out of
gratitude for the king’s generosity to them. They could have bowed to preserve
their influential positions in order to use them to do good for other people.
They could have bowed for the sake of their witness, lest Jews gain a bad
reputation for being uptight, intolerant, narrow-minded, or unpatriotic.
There were many seemingly good reasons why they could have
participated in compromising actions under the pretense that they were not
affected by them and were not exchanging Israel’s God for the gods of Babylon.
Yet these Jews knew better. They knew that no action leaves one unaffected,
and that one’s willingness to compromise means one has already begun
worshiping a lesser god. Their ability to say no
was their witness, and their story continues to be told because they risked it
all to remain faithful. The same is true of Daniel—but that’s next week’s
lesson.
B. Prayer
Most high God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, please
make us like them. Teach us to be obedient to You, especially when it hurts.
Help us to say no
when our actions would betray You. Convict us when saying
no is necessary, because we
are so skilled in explaining our way out of saying it. Make us like Jesus,
whose no to Satan’s
wiles made possible Your yes
for us on Calvary’s cross. In Jesus’ name, amen.
C. Thought to Remember
True worshipers of God are willing to suffer for saying
no.